今天给各位分享考研专硕真题的知识,其中也会对专硕考试题型进行解释,如果能碰巧解决你现在面临的问题,别忘了关注本站,现在开始吧!
56、论证有效性分析:分析下述论证中存在的缺陷和漏洞,选择若干要点,写一篇 600 字左右的文章,对该论证的有效性进行分析和评论。(论证有效性分析的一般要点是:概念特别是核心概念的界定和使用是否准确并前后一致,有无各种明显的逻辑谬误,论证的论据是否成立并支持结论,结论成立的条件是否充分,等等。)
常言道:“耳听为虚,眼见为实。”但实际“眼见未必为实”。从哲学上讲,事物表相不等于事物真相。我们亲眼看到的显然不是事物真相。只有将表相加以分析,透过现象看本质才能看到真相。换言之,我们看到的未必是真实情况,即“所见未必为实”。
举例来说,人们都看到了旭日东升,夕阳西下,也就是说,太阳绕地球转,但是,只是人们站在地球上看的表象而已,其实这是地球自转造成。由此可见,眼见者未必实。
我国古代哲学家老子早就看到了这一点。他说过,人们只看到了房子的“有”(有形的结构),但人们没看到“无” (房子中无形的空间)才有实际效用。这也说明眼所见者未必实,未见着为实。
老子还说,讲究表面的礼节是“忠信之薄”的表现。韩非解释时举例说,父母和子女因为感情深厚而不礼节,可见讲究是感情不深的表现。现在人们把那种客气的行为称作“见外”,也是这个道理。这其实也是一种“眼所见者未必实”的现象。因此,如果你看到有人对你很客气,就认为他对你好,那就错了。
本题的论证主要存在如下问题:
①事物表相不等于事物真相,不意味着表相就一定不是事物真相,虽然事物表相是发现事物真相的前提,但有些时候事物表相就是事物的真相。所以,我们亲眼看到的也有可能是事物真相。
②“太阳绕地球转”是人们对“旭日东升,夕阳西下”这种所见的认识、理解不准确,不能说眼见“旭日东升,夕阳西下”不是事实。
③“旭日东升,夕阳西下”只是一个个例,可能不具有代表性。
④“实际效用”与“实”二者概念不同,此处偷换概念。
⑤“父母和子女因为感情深厚而不礼节”说明不了“讲究是感情不深的表现”。
⑥人们把那种客气的行为称作“见外”,未必是因为感情深厚而不礼节,讲究是感情不深的表现,所以,无法说明这其实也是一种“眼所见者未必实”的现象。
⑦“眼见者未必实”并不能否定“眼见者可能实”,所以,“如果你看到有人对你很客气,就认为他对你好”未必就是错的。
57、论说文:根据下述材料,写一篇 700 字左右的论说文,题目自拟。
我国著名实业家穆藕初在《实业与教育之关系》中指出教育最重要之点在道德教育(如责任心和公共心之养、机械心之拔除)和科学教育(如观察力、推论力、判断力之养成)。完全受此两种教育,实业中坚者遂出之。
参考立意:
材料中的关键词:“道德教育”、“科学教育”、“完全受此两种教育”、“实业”,不必过多引申,可立意为:
道德、科学教育对实业的重要性
参考分论点:
分论点一:为什么科学教育对实业发展重要
科学教育帮助人养成观察力、推理力、判断力等能力。而这些能力是实业中坚者形成决策能力、管理水平、创新能力等职业技能的基础。
分论点二:为什么道德教育对实业发展重要
德才兼备,以德为先,责任心、公共心是实业发展的立身之本,根本一环。
分论点三:道德教育和科学教育是相辅相成、辩证统一的关系。
实业的发展,实业家的出现离不开道德教育和科学教育。离开了道德一味追求技能,很有可能法律道德意识薄弱、缺乏社会责任感、给社会带来难以估量、不可逆转的损失;反之,离开了科学教育只讲道德只会使自己固步自封,难以做出科学决策,科学管理,实业无法发展。
关于2021年图书情报专硕联考初试管综真题:逻辑部分,环球青藤小编今天就暂时和您分享到这里了。如若您对图书情报专硕有浓厚的兴趣,希望这篇文章能够对你的工作或学习有所帮助。如果您还想了解更多关于图书情报专硕考试内容,可以点击本站的其他文章进行学习。
这里有一份最全的考研历年真题资料分享给你
链接:
提取码: i7bd
通过不断研究和学习历年真题,为考生冲刺阶段复习提分指点迷津,做真题,做历年真题集,对照考纲查缺补漏,提高实战素养,制定做题策略,规划方向;
若资源有问题欢迎追问!
Section I Use of English
Directions:
Read the following text. Choose the best word (s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C
or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)
It’s not difficult to set targets for staff. It is much harder,(1)to understand their negative consequences. Most work-related behaviors have multiple components.(2)one and the others become distorted.
Travel on a London bus and you’ll(3)see how this works with drivers. Watch people get on and show their tickets. Are they carefully inspected? Never. Do people get on without paying? Of course! Are there inspectors to(4)that people have paid? Possibly, but very few.And people who run for the bus? They are(5). How about jumping lights? Buses do so almost as frequently as cyclists. Why? Because the target is (6). People complained that buses were late and infrequent.(7),the number of buses and bus lanes were increased, and drivers were 8 or punished according to the time they took. And drivers hit these targets. But they (9) hit cyclists. If the target was changed to (10) , you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing. If the criterion changed to safety, you would get more(11) drivers who obeyed traffic laws. But both these criteria would be at the expense of time. There is another (12) : people became immensely inventive in hitting targets. Have you(13) that you can leave on a flight an hour late but still arrive on time? Tailwinds? Of course not! Airlines have simply changed the time a (14) is meant to take. A one-hour flight is now ballad as a two-hour flight.The (15) of the story is simple.Most jobs are multidimensional, with multiple criteria.Choose one criterion and you may well (16 )others. Everything Can be done faster and made cheaper, but there is a (17 Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negative consequences.This is not an argument against target-setting. But it is an argument for exploring consequences first. All good targets should have multiple criteria(18) itical factors such as time, money, quality and customer feedback. The trick is not only to (19) just one or even two imensions of the objective, but also to understand how to help people better (20he objective.
1. [A] therefore [B] however [C] again [D] moreover
2. [A] Emphasize [B] Identify [C] Assess [D] Explain
3. [A] nearly [B] curiously [C] eagerly [D] quickly
4. [A] claim [B] prove [C] check [D] recall
5. [A] threatened [B] ignored [C] mocked [D] blamed
6. [A] punctuality [B] hospitality [C] competition [D] innovation
7. [A] Yes [B] So [C] Besides [D] Still
8. [A] hired [B] trained [C] rewarded [D] grouped
9. [A] only [B] rather [C] once [D] also
10. [A] comfort [B] revenue [C] efficiency [D] security
11. [A] friendly [B] quiet [C] cautious [D] diligent
12. [A] purpose [B] problem [C] prejudice [D] policy
13. [A] reported [B] revealed [C] admitted [D] noticed
14. [A] break [B] trip [C] departure [D] transfer
15. [A] moral [B] background [C] style [D] form
16. [A] interpret [B] criticize [C] sacrifice [D] tolerate
17. [A] task [B] secret [C] product [D] cast
18. [A] leading to [B] calling for [C] relating to [D] accounting for
19. [A] specify [B] predict [C] restore [D] create
20. [A] modify [B] review [C] present [D] achieve
答案:
1. [B] however
2. [A] Emphasize
3. [D] quickly
4.[C] check
5.[B] ignored
6.[A] punctuality
7.[B] So
8.[C] rewarded
9.[D] also
10.[B] revenue
11.[C] cautious
12.[B] problem
13.[D] noticed
14.[B] trip
15.[B] background
16.[C] sacrifice
17.[D] cast
18.[C] relating to
19.[A] specify
20.[D] achieve
审计专硕考研英语二真题:完型填空的内容小编就说到这里了,更多关于审计专硕的报名入口,报名时间,成绩查询,报名费用,准考证打印入口及时间等问题,小编会及时更新。希望各位考生都能进入自己的理想会计专硕院校。
首都师范大学考研真题
链接:
提取码:29hh
资源如有问题欢迎追问
武汉理工大学应统专硕考研真题可在官网找。根据查询相关公开信息,武汉理工大学应统专硕考研历年真题可以前往武汉理工大学官方网站,进入后找到研究生院,选择应统专硕即可查看历年试题。武汉理工大学(WuhanUniversityofTechnology),简称武理工,位于武汉市,是中华人民共和国教育部直属全国重点大学,国家双一流建设高校。
陕西师范大学心理学考研专硕真题一般可以通过以下渠道购买:
1、报考院校官网,但不提供答案解析
2、网上找回忆版,但是否可靠不清楚
3、学长学姐,但可能也不准确,因为没保障,之后舍友上当过
4、力比多学院陕西师范大学应用心理硕士一本通,有同学用过,真题和解析都有,也有整理针对真题的重难点。
希望对你有用,祝金榜题名。
考研专硕真题的介绍就聊到这里吧,感谢你花时间阅读本站内容,更多关于专硕考试题型、考研专硕真题的信息别忘了在本站进行查找喔。
(内容来源于网络回答聚合,意为学子提供问答帮助,如有错误回答以及广告,请联系管理员删除处理)
部分内容来源于网络转载、学生投稿,如有侵权或对本站有任何意见、建议或者投诉,请联系邮箱(1296178999@qq.com)反馈。 未经本站授权,不得转载、摘编、复制或者建立镜像, 如有违反,本站将追究法律责任!
本文标签: 考研专硕真题 上一篇:考研.(考研a类和b类的区别) 下一篇:气象学研究生(气象学研究生就业前景)